He was there. No, I wasn’t. Yes, you were. It’s quite
unnerving when you have high officials of your country’s defense point fingers at
each other. It gets even more chaotic when you discover that the one who’s
supposed to lead them claims to have nothing to do with a clash which left
fatalities from those in battle and those who weren’t. And while the nation
chews its popcorn in anticipation of the ongoing senate investigation on the
Mamasapano encounter, we may have to open our eyes wider and look at how the
story is being played.
Former SAF Chief Getulio Napeñas and resigned PNP Chief Alan Purisima. Photo taken from newsinfo.inquirer.net |
For one, we rely heavily on media to inform us about what is
happening. Specifically, we may be relying more on major news programs. The
recent string of news reports about the clash made famous the term “fallen 44”.
These also gave special insights on the lives of the Special Action Forces
(SAF) members. What’s striking is not simply that we have had another bloody
fight between government forces and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)
but the overconcentration of media coverage on the SAF which begs the question,
what about the fallen 17 of the MILF (or
200 plus as claimed by SAF)? It’s hard to reconcile that the media is
independent and free from bias when it tends to highlight more the side of the
SAF.
photo taken from abs-cbnnews.com |
Another issue is that given this media framing of the
incident, we may be reinforcing yet again the stereotype on Muslims as “utak
pulbura” or their inclination to wage war. Islam as a religion fundamentally
advocates peace and not all Muslims prefer arms. If we are sincere about the
peace process, we have to seriously strike that balance even in news reporting.
photo taken from GMA 24 Oras |
For a last quick perspective on this, we have to internalize
the effect of a broken chain of command referring to SAF director Getulio
Napenas skipping disclosure of oplan exodus (the SAF operation in Mamasapano to
capture high profile terrorists Marwan and Usman) to DILG secretary Mar Roxas
and acting PNP chief Deputy Director General Leonardo Espina. Why did he choose
to reveal only later on their operation to his direct superiors? And why does
resigned PNP chief Alan Purisima refuse involvement in the plan when Napenas
says otherwise? There seems to be a bigger secret waiting to be discovered.
This covert operation may also remind one a tad bit of the
Jabidah massacre purportedly hatched by the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos
which killed over 20 Tausug soldiers. In the latter, the Tausug young fighters
were supposedly recruited by the government to reclaim Sabah however the plan
became a blur until these fighters were reportedly shot, burned, and buried
somewhere in Manila bay by their recruiters. Jabidah was oplan merdeka and like
oplan exodus it was also planned privately. The massacre led to the creation of
the Moro National Liberation Front, the former group of breakaway MILF. The
Mamasapano incident on the other hand involved the semi-government backed SAF
and MILF plus BIFF.
A wall inscribed with remnants reminding one of the Jabidah Massacre. Photo taken from rappler.com |
0 comments:
Post a Comment